A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

“There isn't any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after a ways they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not signify that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These evidence cannot be treated as evidence of previous seen.

ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, It is usually a well-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and involve all notable cases decided because of the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

The former means “guilty act” and the latter means “guilty mind.” With the omission on the intention, the commission of the act by itself is not plenty of to gain a conviction for that crime. This is actually a fundamental principle that all regulation students are well acquainted with.

three.  I have read the realized counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of this case with their capable assistance.

States also usually have courts that take care of only a specific subset of legal matters, such as family regulation and probate. Case law, also known as precedent or common legislation, is definitely the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending to the relationship between the deciding court plus the precedent, case legislation might be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals with the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) isn't strictly bound to Adhere to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by 1 district court in The big apple is not binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning could help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more

Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice for that loss of the life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment over the offender, making certain They may be held accountable for their actions.

Electronic and paper court more info records retained with the court site may be viewed within the courthouse for free, however there is actually a fee of ten cents for every page to print from a public access terminal.

P.C. Liability of petitioners for that reported offences would be determined by the discovered trial Court after sifting the evidentiary worth from the material generated before the same. Till then, case of

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution may be justified when The essential norm underlying a Constitution disappears and a new system is place in its place.

The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It entails the execution from the convicted person for a consequence of their crime.

this Court is remaining with no option but to direct the respondents to notify the promotion of the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)

13309-B of 2010 for being weak types of evidence along with the evidentiary value whereof would be witnessed at the time in the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, As a result, confirmed custody of the petitioner in jail is not likely to serve any useful purpose at this stage.”

When the death penalty is irreversible, life imprisonment allows with the possibility of reconsideration or commutation with the sentence in certain circumstances.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *